Transactions on Data Analysis in Social Science

Transactions on Data Analysis in Social Science

Examining the Impact of Flexible Partitions in Educational Spaces on the Sense of Belonging of High School Female Students: A Partial Least Squares Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
Abstract
It is well recognized that just as humans influence their environment, the environment also shapes human behavior. Educational spaces, in particular, occupy a significant part of individuals’ lives during the formative stages of personality development. Therefore, careful design and construction of these spaces play a vital role in addressing students’ physical and psychological needs. Among these needs, the sense of belonging to a place is especially important and is strongly linked to spatial design. Rigid and conventional school environments cannot fully address students’ diverse requirements; instead, flexible design strategies are essential. Flexibility in spatial design fosters a sense of belonging by enabling both personal and group-based spatial arrangements. This study investigates the effect of flexible and transformable partitions in educational spaces on students’ sense of belonging and proposes practical design strategies. A mixed descriptive–analytical approach was adopted, beginning with a literature review and theoretical analysis, followed by case study evaluations. Subsequently, a structured questionnaire was administered to the target population, and the data were analyzed using structural equation modeling with a partial least squares (PLS) approach, employing SPSS and SmartPLS3 software. The results confirm that flexible partitions significantly enhance students’ sense of belonging through various design interventions, including the integration of large windows, grouping of spaces with deliberate adjacency, flexible forms, movable furniture and panels, purposeful circulation, potential for future expansion, collective and individual rest/study areas, enhanced transparency, the use of terraces or courtyards, and the creation of multi-functional spaces.
Keywords

  • Pourbagher, S. (2013). Identification of physical factors affecting student satisfaction in educational spaces (Case study: Tehran high schools) [Master's thesis, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University].
  • Abbaszadeh Diz, F., Rashid Kalvir, H., & Rezaei Sharif, A. (2018). An analysis of student satisfaction with physical components of schools with emphasis on participatory learning: Case study of first-grade boys' high schools in Tabriz. Architecture and Urban Planning Letters, 51–71.
  • Javan Farouzandeh, A., & Matlabi, G. (2011). The concept of sense of place belonging and its constitutive factors. City Identity, 5(8), 27–37.
  • Daneshpour, A. H. (2000). Re-examining the concept of identity in urban public spaces (Streets): Case study: Enghelab Street, Tehran [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tehran].
  • Mahdinejad, J., Sadeghi Habibabad, A., & Moslem, H. (2017). Design criteria for educational spaces with emphasis on environmental capabilities affecting students' mind and behavior. Educational Research Quarterly, 1–12.
  • Tabibzadeh, K. S., Ardeshiri, M., & Benazadeh, B. (2020). Reviewing the architecture of educational spaces with emphasis on enhancing spatial qualities (Girls' high schools in Shiraz). Memarshenasi: Journal of Architecture and Urbanism in Iran, 3(15).
  • Zandieh, M., Hessari, P., & Zandieh, A. (2020). Methods of flexibility in updating school architecture and educational approaches. Journal of Educational Technology, 1(15), 181–190.
  • Keshavarz-Hedayati, N., & Sohili, J. (2017). The effect of flexible educational spaces on social sustainability with emphasis on the concept of vitality. In Proceedings of the 4th National Conference on Architecture and Urbanism: Sustainability and Resilience from Ideal to Reality (Qazvin, Iran).
  • Benade, L. (2019). Flexible learning spaces: Inclusive by design? New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 54, 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-019-00127-2
  • Kariippanon, K. E., Cliff, D. P., Lancaster, S. J., Okely, A. D., & Parrish, A.-M. (2019). Flexible learning spaces facilitate interaction, collaboration and behavioural engagement in secondary school. PLoS ONE, 14(10), e0223607. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223607
  • (2017). Students' sense of belonging at school and their relations with teachers. In PISA 2015 Results (Volume III): Students' Well-Being. OECD Publishing.
  • Rands, M. L., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2017). The room itself is active: How classroom design impacts student engagement. Education Publications, 49, xx–xx.
  • Froemke, R., & Young, L. (2021). Oxytocin, neural plasticity, and social behavior. Annual Review of Neuroscience, xx, xx–xx. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-102320-102847
  • Emon, M. H., & Khan, T. (2023). The impact of cultural norms on sustainable entrepreneurship practices in SMEs of Bangladesh. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS), xx, xx–xx. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijias.v3i3.962
  • Yuan, Y., Wang, H., Ding, J., Jin, D., & Li, Y. (2023). Learning to simulate daily activities via modeling dynamic human needs. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (pp. xx–xx). https://doi.org/10.1145/3543507.3583276
  • Kashani-Joo, K. (2010). Cognitive load of theoretical approaches to urban public space. City Identity Journal, 6, 95–106.
  • Matlabi, G. (2006). Re-examining the relationship between form and function in architecture. Honarhaye Tayba Journal, 25, 55–64.
  • Siavashpour, B., Shadlou Jahromi, M., & Nodehi, H. (2011). The role of green spaces in educational environments on enhancing children's sense of place attachment: Case study of elementary schools in District 2, Shiraz. Environmental Sciences Quarterly, 4(14), 105–120.
  • Gardner, D. J., Reynolds, D., Woodward, C., & Balos, C. (2020). Enabling new flexibility in the SUNDIALS suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 48, 1–24.
  • Heroux, M. A. (2015). ACM TOMS replicated computational results initiative. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 41(3), 1-5.
  • Farhoudian, A. (2005). Flexibility, adaptability, and psychiatric indicators. Journal of Cognitive Science Updates, 7(1), xx–xx.
  • Eini Far, A. (2003). A pattern for analyzing flexibility in traditional Iranian housing. Tehran, Iran: Honarhaye Ziba Journal.
  • Hamad, A., & Husein, H. (2023). The types of spatial adaptability based on user preferences of low-income apartments in Erbil city. Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences, xx, xx–xx. https://doi.org/10.30772/qjes.v16i2.932
  • Ouellette, E., Shenoy, A. A., & Gilbert, J. (2018). The seating mechanics of head–neck modular tapers in vitro: Load–displacement measurements, moisture, and rate effects. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 36, xx–xx. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23725
  • Neill, S., Stern, & Etheridge, R. (2008). Flexible learning spaces: The integration of pedagogy, physical design, and instructional technology. Marketing, 18, xx–xx. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2008.11489024
  • Wells, A., Jackson, M., & Benade, L. (2018). Modern learning environments: Embodiment of a disjunctive encounter. In L. Benade & M. Jackson (Eds.), Transforming education: Design, technology, government (pp. 3–17). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5678-9_1
  • Kariippanon, K. E., Cliff, D. P., Lancaster, S. L., Okely, A. D., & Parrish, A. M. (2018). Perceived interplay between flexible learning spaces and teaching, learning and student wellbeing. Learning Environments Research, 21(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9254-9
  • Wood, A. (2018). Selling new learning spaces: Flexibly anything for the 21st century. In L. Benade & M. Jackson (Eds.), Transforming education: Design, technology, government (pp. 95–106). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5678-9_6
  • Niemi, K. (2021). 'The best guess for the future?' Teachers' adaptation to open and flexible learning environments in Finland. Education Inquiry, 12(3), 282–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1816371
  • Bazrafshan, F., & Bavar, S. (2015). The impact of flexible environments on creative learning in school educational settings. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Architecture, Urbanism, Civil Engineering, Art, and Environment (pp. xx–xx). Tehran, Iran.
  • Habibi, A., & Jalalnia, R. (2022). Partial least squares: A practical guide. Tehran, Iran: Narvan.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). PLS-SEM: Indeed, a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Volume 7, Issue 1
Winter 2025
Pages 54-69

  • Receive Date 15 January 2025
  • Revise Date 04 March 2025
  • Accept Date 25 March 2025