This study investigates the effectiveness of Key Performance Indicator (KPI)-driven strategies in aviation maintenance, specifically within Continuing Airworthiness Management Organizations (CAMO). As the aviation industry evolves, CAMOs are increasingly shifting from traditional, reactive maintenance approaches to more proactive, data-driven methods centered around KPIs. This research explores the adoption of KPI-based maintenance strategies, assessing their influence on operational efficiency, regulatory compliance, and overall maintenance performance. Utilizing a mixed-methods research design that combines quantitative data analysis with qualitative insights from industry professionals, the study highlights significant enhancements in maintenance outcomes attributable to the strategic use of KPIs. Advanced analytics enable CAMOs to better predict maintenance needs, optimize resource allocation, and reduce downtime, thereby improving safety and cost-effectiveness. Despite these benefits, the research also identifies challenges related to data integration, organizational change management, and regulatory alignment that must be addressed to fully leverage KPI-driven practices. The study concludes with practical recommendations for aviation maintenance managers aiming to optimize their CAMO operations through targeted KPI implementation. Additionally, it outlines promising directions for future research, including the integration of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to further refine predictive maintenance strategies and enhance the safety and reliability of aviation operations.
Kerres, J. (2019). Airworthiness and its importance in aviation. Satair Expertise Series. Retrieved from https://www.satair.com
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2017). The role of air transport in economic development and globalization. ICAO Reports.
Al-Kaabi, H., Potter, A., & Naim, M. (2007). An outsourcing decision model for airlines’ MRO activities. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 13(3), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510710780258
Pérez-Álvarez, J. M., Maté, A., Gómez López, M. T., & Trujillo, J. (2018). Tactical business-process-decision support based on KPIs monitoring and validation. Computers in Industry, 102, 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.08.001
Bekar, E. T., Çakmakci, M., & Kahraman, C. (2016). Fuzzy COPRAS method for performance measurement in maintenance organizations. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 30(3), 1673–1684.
Salijeni, G., Samsonova-Taddei, A., & Turley, S. (2018). Big data and changes in audit technology: Contemplating a research agenda. Accounting and Business Research, 49(1), 119–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1459458
Samitas, A., & Kampouris, E. (2017). Scientific collaboration and co-authorship in air transport research. Journal of Air Transport Management, 65, 112–120.
Moghadasnian, M. (2022). Data-driven KPI strategies for operational excellence in the airline industry. Journal of Aviation Management, 14(2), 45–60.
Brown-Liburd, H., Issa, H., & Lombardi, D. (2015). Behavioral implications of big data's impact on audit judgment and decision-making. Accounting Horizons, 29(4), 781–801. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51023
European Commission. (2021). CORSIA: Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation. European Commission Report.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.
Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Baqqal, Y., & Hammoumi, M. (2019). Modelling and optimization techniques for maintenance systems using simulation: A systematic literature review. International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v12i3.16622
Muchiri, P., Pintelon, L., Martin, H., & De Meyer, A. (2010). Empirical analysis of maintenance performance measurement in Belgian industries. International Journal of Production Research, 48(17), 5905-5924.
Ng, K., Tang, M., & Lee, C. K. M. (2015). Design and development of a performance evaluation system for the aircraft maintenance industry. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 564-568.
Gonçalves, C. D. F., Dias, J. M., & Machado, V. (2015). Multi-criteria decision methodology for selecting maintenance key performance indicators. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 10(3), 215-223.
Al Tabash, K., Barradah, A., & Al-Shaikh, R. (2014). Empirical Utilization Analysis for High Performance and Grid Computing. 2014 UKSim-AMSS 16th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation, 392-398.
Moghadasnian,S. and Beheshtinia,F. (2024). Advancing Airworthiness Assurance in Airlines: A KPI-Driven Framework for CAMO Excellence. Transactions on Data Analysis in Social Science, 6(1), 22-32. doi: 10.47176/TDASS.2024.22
MLA
Moghadasnian,S. , and Beheshtinia,F. . "Advancing Airworthiness Assurance in Airlines: A KPI-Driven Framework for CAMO Excellence", Transactions on Data Analysis in Social Science, 6, 1, 2024, 22-32. doi: 10.47176/TDASS.2024.22
HARVARD
Moghadasnian S., Beheshtinia F. (2024). 'Advancing Airworthiness Assurance in Airlines: A KPI-Driven Framework for CAMO Excellence', Transactions on Data Analysis in Social Science, 6(1), pp. 22-32. doi: 10.47176/TDASS.2024.22
CHICAGO
S. Moghadasnian and F. Beheshtinia, "Advancing Airworthiness Assurance in Airlines: A KPI-Driven Framework for CAMO Excellence," Transactions on Data Analysis in Social Science, 6 1 (2024): 22-32, doi: 10.47176/TDASS.2024.22
VANCOUVER
Moghadasnian S., Beheshtinia F. Advancing Airworthiness Assurance in Airlines: A KPI-Driven Framework for CAMO Excellence. TDASS, 2024; 6(1): 22-32. doi: 10.47176/TDASS.2024.22