Transactions on Data Analysis in Social Science

Transactions on Data Analysis in Social Science

An Agent-Based Market Simulation with Social Effects

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 School of ECE, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Management, University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
This paper investigates an agent-based market model with a focus on social effects on agent behavior and market dynamics. To simulate these effects, widely used social network topologies from previous research were incorporated into the model. In this framework, agents select one belief from a set of possible beliefs, including fundamentalism, trend chasing, and interrupting strategies. Belief updating occurs based on two main factors: the historical performance of each agent’s own belief and the influence of other agents’ beliefs within the network. To formalize this process, a novel opinion formation model was developed, capturing the dynamic interactions among heterogeneous agents. The diversity of agent decisions generates market heterogeneity, reflecting realistic trading behavior. Simulation results demonstrate that returns across all social network topologies replicate key stylized facts observed in real financial markets. Furthermore, the findings highlight the significant impact of social interactions on price formation and market statistics, emphasizing the role of network structure in shaping market behavior. The proposed agent-based framework provides valuable insights into how individual decision-making and social influence jointly contribute to complex market phenomena, offering a robust tool for analyzing the interplay between agent heterogeneity, social effects, and emergent market properties.
Keywords

  • Conte, R., & Paolucci, M. (2014). On agent-based modeling and computational social science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 668. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00668
  • Sornette, D. (2014). Physics and financial economics (1776–2014): Puzzles, Ising and agent-based models. Reports on Progress in Physics, 77(6), 062001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/6/062001
  • Chen, S. H., Chang, C. L., & Du, Y. R. (2012). Agent-based economic models and econometrics. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 27(2), 187–219. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888912000136
  • Chakraborti, A., Toke, I. M., Patriarca, M., & Abergel, F. (2011). Econophysics review: II. Agent-based models. Quantitative Finance, 11(7), 1013–1041. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2010.539249
  • Samanidou, E., Zschischang, E., Stauffer, D., & Lux, T. (2007). Agent-based models of financial markets. Reports on Progress in Physics, 70(3), 409–450. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/70/3/R03
  • Arthur, W. B. (2018). Asset pricing under endogenous expectations in an artificial stock market. In The economy as an evolving complex system II (pp. 31–60). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429496639-2
  • Martinez-Jaramillo, S., & Tsang, E. P. (2009). A heterogeneous, endogenous and coevolutionary GP-based financial market. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 13(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2008.2011401
  • Brock, W. A., & Hommes, C. H. (1997). A rational route to randomness. Econometrica, 65(5), 1059–1095. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171879
  • Brock, W. A., & Hommes, C. H. (1998). Heterogeneous beliefs and routes to chaos in a simple asset pricing model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 22(8–9), 1235–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(98)00011-6
  • Lux, T. (1995). Herd behaviour, bubbles and crashes. The Economic Journal, 105(431), 881–896. https://doi.org/10.2307/2235156
  • Lux, T. (1998). The socio-economic dynamics of speculative markets: Interacting agents, chaos, and the fat tails of return distributions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 33(2), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(97)00088-7
  • Kirman, A. (1991). Epidemics of opinion and speculative bubbles in financial markets. In Money and Financial Markets (pp. 17–31).
  • Kirman, A. (1993). Ants, rationality, and recruitment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118498
  • Westerhoff, F. H. (2008). The use of agent-based financial market models to test the effectiveness of regulatory policies. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 228(2–3), 195–227. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2008-2-305
  • Yeh, C. H., & Yang, C. Y. (2015). Social networks and asset price dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 19(3), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2014.2322121
  • Alfarano, S., & Milaković, M. (2009). Network structure and N-dependence in agent-based herding models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 33(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2008.05.003
  • Panchenko, V., Gerasymchuk, S., & Pavlov, O. V. (2013). Asset price dynamics with heterogeneous beliefs and local network interactions. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37(12), 2623–2642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2013.06.015
  • Westerhoff, F. (2010). An agent-based macroeconomic model with interacting firms, socio-economic opinion formation and optimistic/pessimistic sales expectations. New Journal of Physics, 12(7), 075035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/7/075035
  • Newman, M. E., & Watts, D. J. (1999). Scaling and percolation in the small-world network model. Physical Review E, 60(6), 7332–7342. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.60.7332
  • Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A. L. (1999). Internet: Diameter of the world-wide web. Nature, 401(6749), 130–131. https://doi.org/10.1038/43601
  • Schmitt, N., & Westerhoff, F. (2017). Heterogeneity, spontaneous coordination and extreme events within large-scale and small-scale agent-based financial market models. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27(5), 1041–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-017-0504-x
Volume 3, Issue 1
2021
Pages 23-29

  • Receive Date 15 December 2020
  • Revise Date 27 January 2021
  • Accept Date 09 March 2021